QUADRAGESIMO
ANNO
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XI
ON RECONSTRUCTION OF THE SOCIAL ORDER
TO OUR VENERABLE BRETHREN, THE PATRIARCHS,
PRIMATES,
ARCHBISHOPS, BISHOPS, AND OTHER ORDINARIES
IN PEACE AND COMMUNION WITH THE APOSTOLIC
SEE,
AND LIKEWISE TO ALL THE FAITHFUL OF THE
CATHOLIC WORLD.
Venerable Brethren
and Beloved Children, Health and Apostolic
Benediction.
Forty years
have passed since Leo XIII's peerless
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
first saw the light, and the whole Catholic
world, filled with grateful recollection, is
undertaking to commemorate it with befitting
solemnity.
2. Other
Encyclicals of Our Predecessor had in a way
prepared the path for that outstanding
document and proof of pastoral care: namely,
those on the family and the Holy Sacrament
of Matrimony as the source of human
society,[1] on the origin of civil
authority[2] and its proper relations with
the Church,[3] on the chief duties of
Christian citizens,[4] against the tenets of
Socialism[5] against false teachings on
human liberty,[6] and others of the same
nature fully expressing the mind of Leo
XIII. Yet the Encyclical, On the
Condition of Workers, compared with the
rest had this special distinction that at a
time when it was most opportune and actually
necessary to do so, it laid down for all
mankind the surest rules to solve aright
that difficult problem of human relations
called "the social question."
3. For toward
the close of the nineteenth century, the new
kind of economic life that had arisen and
the new developments of industry had gone to
the point in most countries that human
society was clearly becoming divided more
and more into two classes. One class, very
small in number, was enjoying almost all the
advantages which modern inventions so
abundantly provided; the other, embracing
the huge multitude of working people,
oppressed by wretched poverty, was vainly
seeking escape from the straits wherein it
stood.
4. Quite
agreeable, of course, was this state of
things to those who thought it in their
abundant riches the result of inevitable
economic laws and accordingly, as if it were
for charity to veil the violation of justice
which lawmakers not only tolerated but at
times sanctioned, wanted the whole care of
supporting the poor committed to charity
alone. The workers, on the other hand,
crushed by their hard lot, were barely
enduring it and were refusing longer to bend
their necks beneath so galling a yoke; and
some of them, carried away by the heat of
evil counsel, were seeking the overturn of
everything, while others, whom Christian
training restrained from such evil designs,
stood firm in the judgment that much in this
had to be wholly and speedily changed.
5. The same
feeling those many Catholics, both priests
and laymen, shared, whom a truly wonderful
charity had long spurred on to relieve the
unmerited poverty of the non-owning workers,
and who could in no way convince themselves
that so enormous and unjust an in equality
in the distribution of this world's goods
truly conforms to the designs of the
all-wise Creator.
6. Those men
were without question sincerely seeking an
immediate remedy for this lamentable
disorganization of States and a secure
safeguard against worse dangers. Yet such is
the weakness of even the best of human minds
that, now rejected as dangerous innovators,
now hindered in the good work by their very
associates advocating other courses of
action, and, uncertain in the face of
various opinions, they were at a loss which
way to turn.
7. In such a
sharp conflict of mind, therefore, while the
question at issue was being argued this way
and that, nor always with calmness, all eyes
as often before turned to the Chair of
Peter, to that sacred depository of all
truth whence words of salvation pour forth
to all the world. And to the feet of
Christ's Vicar on earth were flocking in
unaccustomed numbers, men well versed in
social questions, employers, and workers
themselves, begging him with one voice to
point out, finally, the safe road to them.
8. The wise
Pontiff long weighed all this in his mind
before God; he summoned the most experienced
and learned to counsel; he pondered the
issues carefully and from every angle. At
last, admonished "by the consciousness of
His Apostolic Office"[7] lest silence on his
part might be regarded as failure in his
duty[8] he decided, in virtue of the Divine
Teaching Office entrusted to him, to address
not only the whole Church of Christ but all
mankind.
9. Therefore
on the fifteenth day of May, 1891, that long
awaited voice thundered forth; neither
daunted by the arduousness of the problem
nor weakened by age but with vigorous
energy, it taught the whole human family to
strike out in the social question upon new
paths.
10. You know,
Venerable Brethren and Beloved Children, and
understand full well the wonderful teaching
which has made the Encyclical, On the
Condition of Workers, illustrious
forever. The Supreme Pastor in this Letter,
grieving that so large a portion of mankind
should "live undeservedly in miserable and
wretched conditions,"[9] took it upon
himself with great courage to defend "the
cause of the workers whom the present age
had handed over, each alone and defenseless,
to the inhumanity of employers and the
unbridled greed of competitors."[10] He
sought no help from either Liberalism or
Socialism, for the one had proved that it
was utterly unable to solve the social
problem aright, and the other, proposing a
remedy far worse than the evil itself, would
have plunged human society into great
dangers.
11. Since a
problem was being treated "for which no
satisfactory solution" is found "unless
religion and the Church have been called
upon to aid,"[11] the Pope, clearly
exercising his right and correctly holding
that the guardianship of religion and the
stewardship over those things that are
closely bound up with it had been entrusted
especially to him and relying solely upon
the unchangeable principles drawn from the
treasury of right reason and Divine
Revelation, confidently and as one having
authority,[12] declared and proclaimed
"the rights and duties within which the rich
and the proletariat - those who furnish
material things and those who furnish work -
ought to be restricted in relation to each
other,"[13] and what the Church, heads of
States and the people themselves directly
concerned ought to do.
12. The
Apostolic voice did not thunder forth in
vain. On the contrary, not only did the
obedient children of the Church hearken to
it with marveling admiration and hail it
with the greatest applause, but many also
who were wandering far from the truth, from
the unity of the faith, and nearly all who
since then either in private study or in
enacting legislation have concerned
themselves with the social and economic
question.
13. Feeling
themselves vindicated and defended by the
Supreme Authority on earth, Christian
workers received this Encyclical with
special joy. So, too, did all those
noble-hearted men who, long solicitous for
the improvement of the condition of the
workers, had up to that time encountered
almost nothing but indifference from many,
and even rankling suspicion, if not open
hostility, from some. Rightly, therefore,
have all these groups constantly held the
Apostolic Encyclical from that time in such
high honor that to signify their gratitude
they are wont, in various places and in
various ways, to commemorate it every year.
14. However,
in spite of such great agreement, there were
some who were not a little disturbed; and so
it happened that the teaching of Leo XIII,
so noble and lofty and so utterly new to
worldly ears, was held suspect by some, even
among Catholics, and to certain ones it even
gave offense. For it boldly attacked and
overturned the idols of Liberalism, ignored
long-standing prejudices, and was in advance
of its time beyond all expectation, so that
the slow of heart disdained to study this
new social philosophy and the timid feared
to scale so lofty a height. There were some
also who stood, indeed, in awe at its
splendor, but regarded it as a kind of
imaginary ideal of perfection more desirable
then attainable.
15. Venerable
Brethren and Beloved Children, as all
everywhere and especially Catholic workers
who are pouring from all sides into this
Holy City, are celebrating with such
enthusiasm the solemn commemoration of the
fortieth anniversary of the Encyclical On
the Condition of Workers, We deem it
fitting on this occasion to recall the great
benefits this Encyclical has brought to the
Catholic Church and to all human society; to
defend the illustrious Master's doctrine on
the social and economic question against
certain doubts and to develop it more fully
as to some points; and lastly, summoning to
court the contemporary economic regime and
passing judgment on Socialism, to lay bare
the root of the existing social confusion
and at the same time point the only way to
sound restoration: namely, the Christian
reform of morals. All these matters which we
undertake to treat will fall under three
main headings, and this entire Encyclical
will be devoted to their development.
16. To begin
with the topic which we have proposed first
to discuss, We cannot refrain, following the
counsel of St. Ambrose[14] who says that "no
duty is more important than that of
returning thanks," from offering our fullest
gratitude to Almighty God for the immense
benefits that have come through Leo's
Encyclical to the Church and to human
society. If indeed We should wish to review
these benefits even cursorily, almost the
whole history of the social question during
the last forty years would have to be
recalled to mind. These benefits can be
reduced conveniently, however, to three main
points, corresponding to the three kinds of
help which Our Predecessor ardently desired
for the accomplishment of his great work of
restoration.
17. In the
first place Leo himself clearly stated what
ought to be expected from the Church:[15]
"Manifestly it is the Church which draws
from the Gospel the teachings through which
the struggle can be composed entirely, or,
after its bitterness is removed, can
certainly become more tempered. It is the
Church, again, that strives not only to
instruct the mind, but to regulate by her
precepts the life and morals of individuals,
and that ameliorates the condition of the
workers through her numerous and beneficent
institutions "
18. The
Church did not let these rich fountains lie
quiescent in her bosom, but from them drew
copiously for the common good of the
longed-for peace. Leo himself and his
Successors, showing paternal charity and
pastoral constancy always, in defense
especially of the poor and the weak,[16]
proclaimed and urged without ceasing again
and again by voice and pen the teaching on
the social and economic question which On
the Condition of Workers presented, and
adapted it fittingly to the needs of time
and of circumstance. And many bishops have
done the same, who in their continual and
able interpretation of this same teaching
have illustrated it with commentaries and in
accordance with the mind and instructions of
the Holy See provided for its application to
the conditions and institutions of diverse
regions.[17]
19. It is not
surprising, therefore, that many scholars,
both priests and laymen, led especially by
the desire that the unchanged and
unchangeable teaching of the Church should
meet new demands and needs more effectively,
have zealously undertaken to develop, with
the Church as their guide and teacher, a
social and economic science in accord with
the conditions of our time.
20. And so,
with Leo's Encyclical pointing the way and
furnishing the light, a true Catholic social
science has arisen, which is daily fostered
and enriched by the tireless efforts of
those chosen men whom We have termed
auxiliaries of the Church. They do not,
indeed, allow their science to lie hidden
behind learned walls. As the useful and well
attended courses instituted in Catholic
universities, colleges, and seminaries, the
social congresses and "weeks" that are held
at frequent intervals with most successful
results, the study groups that are promoted,
and finally the timely and sound
publications that are disseminated
everywhere and in every possible way,
clearly show, these men bring their science
out into the full light and stress of life.
21. Nor is
the benefit that has poured forth from Leo's
Encyclical confined within these bounds; for
the teaching which On the Condition of
Workers contains has gradually and
imperceptibly worked its way into the minds
of those outside Catholic unity who do not
recognize the authority of the Church.
Catholic principles on the social question
have as a result, passed little by little
into the patrimony of all human society, and
We rejoice that the eternal truths which Our
Predecessor of glorious memory proclaimed so
impressively have been frequently invoked
and defended not only in non-Catholic books
and journals but in legislative halls also
courts of justice.
22.
Furthermore, after the terrible war, when
the statesmen of the leading nations were
attempting to restore peace on the basis of
a thorough reform of social conditions, did
not they, among the norms agreed upon to
regulate in accordance with justice and
equity the labor of the workers, give
sanction to many points that so remarkably
coincide with Leo's principles and
instructions as to seem consciously taken
therefrom? The Encyclical On the
Condition of Workers, without question,
has become a memorable document and rightly
to it may be applied the words of Isaias:
"He shall set up a standard to the
nations."[18]
23.
Meanwhile, as Leo's teachings were being
widely diffused in the minds of men, with
learned investigations leading the way, they
have come to be put into practice. In the
first place, zealous efforts have been made,
with active good will, to lift up that class
which on account of the modern expansion of
industry had increased to enormous numbers
but not yet had obtained its rightful place
or rank in human society and was, for that
reason, all but neglected and despised - the
workers, We mean - to whose improvement, to
the great advantage of souls, the diocesan
and regular clergy, though burdened with
other pastoral duties, have under the
leadership of the Bishops devoted
themselves. This constant work, undertaken
to fill the workers' souls with the
Christian spirit, helped much also to make
them conscious of their true dignity and
render them capable, by placing clearly
before them the rights and duties of their
class, of legitimately and happily advancing
and even of becoming leaders of their
fellows.
24. From that
time on, fuller means of livelihood have
been more securely obtained; for not only
did works of beneficence and charity begin
to multiply at the urging of the Pontiff,
but there have also been established
everywhere new and continuously expanding
organizations in which workers, draftsmen,
farmers and employees of every kind, with
the counsel of the Church and frequently
under the leadership of her priests, give
and receive mutual help and support.
25. With
regard to civil authority, Leo XIII, boldly
breaking through the confines imposed by
Liberalism, fearlessly taught that
government must not be thought a mere
guardian of law and of good order, but
rather must put forth every effort so that
"through the entire scheme of laws and
institutions . . . both public and
individual well-being may develop
spontaneously out of the very structure and
administration of the State."[19] Just
freedom of action must, of course, be left
both to individual citizens and to families,
yet only on condition that the common good
be preserved and wrong to any individual be
abolished. The function of the rulers of the
State, moreover, is to watch over the
community and its parts; but in protecting
private individuals in their rights, chief
consideration ought to be given to the weak
and the poor. "For the nation, as it were,
of the rich is guarded by its own defenses
and is in less need of governmental
protection, whereas the suffering multitude,
without the means to protect itself relies
especially on the protection of the State.
Wherefore, since wageworkers are numbered
among the great mass of the needy, the State
must include them under its special care and
foresight."[20]
26. We, of
course, do not deny that even before the
Encyclical of Leo, some rulers of peoples
have provided for certain of the more urgent
needs of the workers and curbed more
flagrant acts of injustice inflicted upon
them. But after the Apostolic voice had
sounded from the Chair of Peter throughout
the world, rulers of nations, more fully
alive at last to their duty, devoted their
minds and attention to the task of promoting
a more comprehensive and fruitful social
policy.
27. And while
the principles of Liberalism were tottering,
which had long prevented effective action by
those governing the State, the Encyclical
On the Condition of Workers in truth
impelled peoples themselves to promote a
social policy on truer grounds and with
greater intensity, and so strongly
encouraged good Catholics to furnish
valuable help to heads of States in this
field that they often stood forth as
illustrious champions of this new policy
even in legislatures. Sacred ministers of
the Church, thoroughly imbued with Leo's
teaching, have, in fact, often proposed to
the votes of the peoples' representatives
the very social legislation that has been
enacted in recent years and have resolutely
demanded and promoted its enforcement.
28. A new
branch of law, wholly unknown to the earlier
time, has arisen from this continuous and
unwearied labor to protect vigorously the
sacred rights of the workers that flow from
their dignity as men and as Christians.
These laws undertake the protection of life,
health, strength, family, homes, workshops,
wages and labor hazards, in fine, everything
which pertains to the condition of wage
workers, with special concern for women and
children. Even though these laws do not
conform exactly everywhere and in all
respects to Leo's recommendations, still it
is undeniable that much in them savors of
the Encyclical, On the Condition of
Workers, to which great credit must be
given for whatever improvement has been
achieved in the workers' condition.
29. Finally,
the wise Pontiff showed that "employers and
workers themselves can accomplish much in
this matter, manifestly through those
institutions by the help of which the poor
are opportunely assisted and the two classes
of society are brought closer to each
other."[21] First place among these
institutions, he declares, must be assigned
to associations that embrace either workers
alone or workers and employers together. He
goes into considerable detail in explaining
and commending these associations and
expounds with a truly wonderful wisdom their
nature, purpose, timeliness, rights, duties,
and regulations.
30. These
teachings were issued indeed most
opportunely. For at that time in many
nations those at the helm of State, plainly
imbued with Liberalism, were showing little
favor to workers' associations of this type;
nay, rather they openly opposed them, and
while going out of their way to recognize
similar organizations of other classes and
show favor to them, they were with criminal
injustice denying the natural right to form
associations to those who needed it most to
defend themselves from ill treatment at the
hands of the powerful. There were even some
Catholics who looked askance at the efforts
of workers to form associations of this type
as if they smacked of a socialistic or
revolutionary spirit.
31. The
rules, therefore, which Leo XIII issued in
virtue of his authority, deserve the
greatest praise in that they have been able
to break down this hostility and dispel
these suspicions; but they have even a
higher claim to distinction in that they
encouraged Christian workers to found mutual
associations according to their various
occupations, taught them how to do so, and
resolutely confirmed in the path of duty a
goodly number of those whom socialist
organizations strongly attracted by claiming
to be the sole defenders and champions of
the lowly and oppressed.
32. With
respect to the founding of these societies,
the Encyclical On the Condition of
Workers most fittingly declared that
"workers' associations ought to be so
constituted and so governed as to furnish
the most suitable and most convenient means
to attain the object proposed, which
consists in this, that the individual
members of the association secure, so far as
is possible, an increase in the goods of
body, of soul, and of property," yet it is
clear that "moral and religious perfection
ought to be regarded as their principal
goal, and that their social organization as
such ought above all to be directed
completely by this goal."[22] For "when the
regulations of associations are founded upon
religion, the way is easy toward
establishing the mutual relations of the
members, so that peaceful living together
and prosperity will result."[23]
33. To the
founding of these associations the clergy
and many of the laity devoted themselves
everywhere with truly praiseworthy zeal,
eager to bring Leo's program to full
realization. Thus associations of this kind
have molded truly Christian workers who, in
combining harmoniously the diligent practice
of their occupation with the salutary
precepts of religion, protect effectively
and resolutely their own temporal interests
and rights, keeping a due respect for
justice and a genuine desire to work
together with other classes of society for
the Christian renewal of all social life.
34. These
counsels and instructions of Leo XIII were
put into effect differently in different
places according to varied local conditions.
In some places one and the same association
undertook to attain all the ends laid down
by the Pontiff; in others, because
circumstances suggested or required it, a
division of work developed and separate
associations were formed. Of these, some
devoted themselves to the defense of the
rights and legitimate interests of their
members in the labor market; others took
over the work of providing mutual economic
aid; finally still others gave all their
attention to the fulfillment of religious
and moral duties and other obligations of
like nature.
35. This
second method has especially been adopted
where either the laws of a country, or
certain special economic institutions, or
that deplorable dissension of minds and
hearts so widespread in contemporary society
and an urgent necessity of combating with
united purpose and strength the massed ranks
of revolutionarists, have prevented
Catholics from founding purely Catholic
labor unions. Under these conditions,
Catholics seem almost forced to join secular
labor unions. These unions, however, should
always profess justice and equity and give
Catholic members full freedom to care for
their own conscience and obey the laws of
the Church. It is clearly the office of
bishops, when they know that these
associations are on account of circumstances
necessary and are not dangerous to religion,
to approve of Catholic workers joining them,
keeping before their eyes, however, the
principles and precautions laid down by Our
Predecessor, Pius X of holy memory.[24]
Among these precautions the first and chief
is this: Side by side with these unions
there should always be associations
zealously engaged in imbuing and forming
their members in the teaching of religion
and morality so that they in turn may be
able to permeate the unions with that good
spirit which should direct them in all their
activity. As a result, the religious
associations will bear good fruit even
beyond the circle of their own membership.
36. To the
Encyclical of Leo, therefore, must be given
this credit, that these associations of
workers have so flourished everywhere that
while, alas, still surpassed in numbers by
socialist and communist organizations, they
already embrace a vast multitude of workers
and are able, within the confines of each
nation as well as in wider assemblies, to
maintain vigorously the rights and
legitimate demands of Catholic workers and
insist also on the salutary Christian
principles of society.
37. Leo's
learned treatment and vigorous defense of
the natural right to form associations
began, furthermore, to find ready
application to other associations also and
not alone to those of the workers. Hence no
small part of the credit must, it seems, be
given to this same Encyclical of Leo for the
fact that among farmers and others of the
middle class most useful associations of
this kind are seen flourishing to a notable
degree and increasing day by day, as well as
other institutions of a similar nature in
which spiritual development and economic
benefit are happily combined.
38. But if
this cannot be said of organizations which
Our same Predecessor intensely desired
established among employers and managers of
industry - and We certainly regret that they
are so few - the condition is not wholly due
to the will of men but to far graver
difficulties that hinder associations of
this kind which We know well and estimate at
their full value. There is, however, strong
hope that these obstacles also will be
removed soon, and even now We greet with the
deepest joy of Our soul, certain by no means
insignificant attempts in this direction,
the rich fruits of which promise a still
richer harvest in the future.[25]
39. All these
benefits of Leo's Encyclical, Venerable
Brethren and Beloved Children, which We have
outlined rather than fully described, are so
numerous and of such import as to show
plainly that this immortal document does not
exhibit a merely fanciful, even if
beautiful, ideal of human society. Rather
did our Predecessor draw from the Gospel
and, therefore, from an ever-living and
life-giving fountain, teachings capable of
greatly mitigating, if not immediately
terminating that deadly internal struggle
which is rending the family of mankind. The
rich fruits which the Church of Christ and
the whole human race have, by God's favor,
reaped therefrom unto salvation prove that
some of this good seed, so lavishly sown
forty years ago, fell on good ground. On the
basis of the long period of experience, it
cannot be rash to say that Leo's Encyclical
has proved itself the Magna Charta
upon which all Christian activity in the
social field ought to be based, as on a
foundation. And those who would seem to hold
in little esteem this Papal Encyclical and
its commemoration either blaspheme what they
know not, or understand nothing of what they
are only superficially acquainted with, or
if they do understand convict themselves
formally of injustice and ingratitude.
40. Yet since
in the course of these same years, certain
doubts have arisen concerning either the
correct meaning of some parts of Leo's
Encyclical or conclusions to be deduced
therefrom, which doubts in turn have even
among Catholics given rise to controversies
that are not always peaceful; and since,
furthermore, new needs and changed
conditions of our age have made necessary a
more precise application of Leo's teaching
or even certain additions thereto, We most
gladly seize this fitting occasion, in
accord with Our Apostolic Office through
which We are debtors to all,[26] to answer,
so far as in Us lies, these doubts and these
demands of the present day.
41. Yet
before proceeding to explain these matters,
that principle which Leo XIII so clearly
established must be laid down at the outset
here, namely, that there resides in Us the
right and duty to pronounce with supreme
authority upon social and economic
matters.[27] Certainly the Church was not
given the commission to guide men to an only
fleeting and perishable happiness but to
that which is eternal. Indeed" the Church
holds that it is unlawful for her to mix
without cause in these temporal
concerns"[28]; however, she can in no wise
renounce the duty God entrusted to her to
interpose her authority, not of course in
matters of technique for which she is
neither suitably equipped nor endowed by
office, but in all things that are connected
with the moral law. For as to these, the
deposit of truth that God committed to Us
and the grave duty of disseminating and
interpreting the whole moral law, and of
urging it in season and out of season, bring
under and subject to Our supreme
jurisdiction not only social order but
economic activities themselves.
42. Even
though economics and moral science employs
each its own principles in its own sphere,
it is, nevertheless, an error to say that
the economic and moral orders are so
distinct from and alien to each other that
the former depends in no way on the latter.
Certainly the laws of economics, as they are
termed, being based on the very nature of
material things and on the capacities of the
human body and mind, determine the limits of
what productive human effort cannot, and of
what it can attain in the economic field and
by what means. Yet it is reason itself that
clearly shows, on the basis of the
individual and social nature of things and
of men, the purpose which God ordained for
all economic life.
43. But it is
only the moral law which, just as it
commands us to seek our supreme and last end
in the whole scheme of our activity, so
likewise commands us to seek directly in
each kind of activity those purposes which
we know that nature, or rather God the
Author of nature, established for that kind
of action, and in orderly relationship to
subordinate such immediate purposes to our
supreme and last end. If we faithfully
observe this law, then it will follow that
the particular purposes, both individual and
social, that are sought in the economic
field will fall in their proper place in the
universal order of purposes, and We, in
ascending through them, as it were by steps,
shall attain the final end of all things,
that is God, to Himself and to us, the
supreme and inexhaustible Good.
44. But to
come down to particular points, We shall
begin with ownership or the right of
property. Venerable Brethren and Beloved
Children, you know that Our Predecessor of
happy memory strongly defended the right of
property against the tenets of the
Socialists of his time by showing that its
abolition would result, not to the advantage
of the working class, but to their extreme
harm. Yet since there are some who
calumniate the Supreme Pontiff, and the
Church herself, as if she had taken and were
still taking the part of the rich against
the non-owning workers - certainly no
accusation is more unjust than that - and
since Catholics are at variance with one
another concerning the true and exact mind
of Leo, it has seemed best to vindicate
this, that is, the Catholic teaching on this
matter from calumnies and safeguard it from
false interpretations.
45. First,
then, let it be considered as certain and
established that neither Leo nor those
theologians who have taught under the
guidance and authority of the Church have
ever denied or questioned the twofold
character of ownership, called usually
individual or social according as it regards
either separate persons or the common good.
For they have always unanimously maintained
that nature, rather the Creator Himself, has
given man the right of private ownership not
only that individuals may be able to provide
for themselves and their families but also
that the goods which the Creator destined
for the entire family of mankind may through
this institution truly serve this purpose.
All this can be achieved in no wise except
through the maintenance of a certain and
definite order.
46.
Accordingly, twin rocks of shipwreck must be
carefully avoided. For, as one is wrecked
upon, or comes close to, what is known as
"individualism" by denying or minimizing the
social and public character of the right of
property, so by rejecting or minimizing the
private and individual character of this
same right, one inevitably runs into
"collectivism" or at least closely
approaches its tenets. Unless this is kept
in mind, one is swept from his course upon
the shoals of that moral, juridical, and
social modernism which We denounced in the
Encyclical issued at the beginning of Our
Pontificate.[29] And, in particular, let
those realize this who, in their desire for
innovation, do not scruple to reproach the
Church with infamous calumnies, as if she
had allowed to creep into the teachings of
her theologians a pagan concept of ownership
which must be completely replaced by another
that they with amazing ignorance call
"Christian."
47. In order
to place definite limits on the
controversies that have arisen over
ownership and its inherent duties there must
be first laid down as foundation a principle
established by Leo XIII: The right of
property is distinct from its use.[30] That
justice called commutative commands sacred
respect for the division of possessions and
forbids invasion of others' rights through
the exceeding of the limits of one's own
property; but the duty of owners to use
their property only in a right way does not
come under this type of justice, but under
other virtues, obligations of which "cannot
be enforced by legal action."[31] Therefore,
they are in error who assert that ownership
and its right use are limited by the same
boundaries; and it is much farther still
from the truth to hold that a right to
property is destroyed or lost by reason of
abuse or non-use.
48. Those,
therefore, are doing a work that is truly
salutary and worthy of all praise who, while
preserving harmony among themselves and the
integrity of the traditional teaching of the
Church, seek to define the inner nature of
these duties and their limits whereby either
the right of property itself or its use,
that is, the exercise of ownership, is
circumscribed by the necessities of social
living. On the other hand, those who seek to
restrict the individual character of
ownership to such a degree that in fact they
destroy it are mistaken and in error.
49. It
follows from what We have termed the
individual and at the same time social
character of ownership, that men must
consider in this matter not only their own
advantage but also the common good. To
define these duties in detail when necessity
requires and the natural law has not done
so, is the function of those in charge of
the State. Therefore, public authority,
under the guiding light always of the
natural and divine law, can determine more
accurately upon consideration of the true
requirements of the common good, what is
permitted and what is not permitted to
owners in the use of their property.
Moreover, Leo XIII wisely taught "that God
has left the limits of private possessions
to be fixed by the industry of men and
institutions of peoples."[32] That history
proves ownership, like other elements of
social life, to be not absolutely
unchanging, We once declared as follows:
"What divers forms has property had, from
that primitive form among rude and savage
peoples, which may be observed in some
places even in our time, to the form of
possession in the patriarchal age; and so
further to the various forms under tyranny
(We are using the word tyranny in its
classical sense); and then through the
feudal and monarchial forms down to the
various types which are to be found in more
recent times."[33] That the State is not
permitted to discharge its duty arbitrarily
is, however, clear. The natural right itself
both of owning goods privately and of
passing them on by inheritance ought always
to remain intact and inviolate, since this
indeed is a right that the State cannot take
away: "For man is older than the State,"[34]
and also "domestic living together is prior
both in thought and in fact to uniting into
a polity."[35] Wherefore the wise Pontiff
declared that it is grossly unjust for a
State to exhaust private wealth through the
weight of imposts and taxes. "For since the
right of possessing goods privately has been
conferred not by man's law, but by nature,
public authority cannot abolish it, but can
only control its exercise and bring it into
conformity with the common weal."[36] Yet
when the State brings private ownership into
harmony with the needs of the common good,
it does not commit a hostile act against
private owners but rather does them a
friendly service; for it thereby effectively
prevents the private possession of goods,
which the Author of nature in His most wise
providence ordained for the support of human
life, from causing intolerable evils and
thus rushing to its own destruction; it does
not destroy private possessions, but
safeguards them; and it does not weaken
private property rights, but strengthens
them.
50.
Furthermore, a person's superfluous income,
that is, income which he does not need to
sustain life fittingly and with dignity, is
not left wholly to his own free
determination. Rather the Sacred Scriptures
and the Fathers of the Church constantly
declare in the most explicit language that
the rich are bound by a very grave precept
to practice almsgiving, beneficence, and
munificence.
51. Expending
larger incomes so that opportunity for
gainful work may be abundant, provided,
however, that this work is applied to
producing really useful goods, ought to be
considered, as We deduce from the principles
of the Angelic Doctor,[37] an outstanding
exemplification of the virtue of munificence
and one particularly suited to the needs of
the times.
52. That
ownership is originally acquired both by
occupancy of a thing not owned by any one
and by labor, or, as is said, by
specification, the tradition of all ages as
well as the teaching of Our Predecessor Leo
clearly testifies. For, whatever some idly
say to the contrary, no injury is done to
any person when a thing is occupied that is
available to all but belongs to no one;
however, only that labor which a man
performs in his own name and by virtue of
which a new form or increase has been given
to a thing grants him title to these fruits.
53. Far
different is the nature of work that is
hired out to others and expended on the
property of others. To this indeed
especially applies what Leo XIII says is "incontestible,"
namely, that "the wealth of nations
originates from no other source than from
the labor of workers."[38] For is it not
plain that the enormous volume of goods that
makes up human wealth is produced by and
issues from the hands of the workers that
either toil unaided or have their efficiency
marvelously increased by being equipped with
tools or machines? Every one knows, too,
that no nation has ever risen out of want
and poverty to a better and nobler condition
save by the enormous and combined toil of
all the people, both those who manage work
and those who carry out directions. But it
is no less evident that, had not God the
Creator of all things, in keeping with His
goodness, first generously bestowed natural
riches and resources - the wealth and forces
of nature - such supreme efforts would have
been idle and vain, indeed could never even
have begun. For what else is work but to use
or exercise the energies of mind and body on
or through these very things? And in the
application of natural resources to human
use the law of nature, or rather God's will
promulgated by it, demands that right order
be observed. This order consists in this:
that each thing have its proper owner. Hence
it follows that unless a man is expending
labor on his own property, the labor of one
person and the property of another must be
associated, for neither can produce anything
without the other. Leo XIII certainly had
this in mind when he wrote: "Neither capital
can do without labor, nor labor without
capital."[39] Wherefore it is wholly false
to ascribe to property alone or to labor
alone whatever has been obtained through the
combined effort of both, and it is wholly
unjust for either, denying the efficacy of
the other, to arrogate to itself whatever
has been produced.
54. Property,
that is, "capital," has undoubtedly long
been able to appropriate too much to itself.
Whatever was produced, whatever returns
accrued, capital claimed for itself, hardly
leaving to the worker enough to restore and
renew his strength. For the doctrine was
preached that all accumulation of capital
falls by an absolutely insuperable economic
law to the rich, and that by the same law
the workers are given over and bound to
perpetual want, to the scantiest of
livelihoods. It is true, indeed, that things
have not always and everywhere corresponded
with this sort of teaching of the so-called
Manchesterian Liberals; yet it cannot be
denied that economic social institutions
have moved steadily in that direction. That
these false ideas, these erroneous
suppositions, have been vigorously assailed,
and not by those alone who through them were
being deprived of their innate right to
obtain better conditions, will surprise no
one.
55. And
therefore, to the harassed workers there
have come "intellectuals," as they are
called, setting up in opposition to a
fictitious law the equally fictitious moral
principle that all products and profits,
save only enough to repair and renew
capital, belong by very right to the
workers. This error, much more specious than
that of certain of the Socialists who hold
that whatever serves to produce goods ought
to be transferred to the State, or, as they
say "socialized," is consequently all the
more dangerous and the more apt to deceive
the unwary. It is an alluring poison which
many have eagerly drunk whom open Socialism
had not been able to deceive.
56.
Unquestionably, so as not to close against
themselves the road to justice and peace
through these false tenets, both parties
ought to have been forewarned by the wise
words of Our Predecessor: "However the earth
may be apportioned among private owners, it
does not cease to serve the common interests
of all."[40] This same doctrine We ourselves
also taught above in declaring that the
division of goods which results from private
ownership was established by nature itself
in order that created things may serve the
needs of mankind in fixed and stable order.
Lest one wander from the straight path of
truth, this is something that must be
continually kept in mind.
57. But not
every distribution among human beings of
property and wealth is of a character to
attain either completely or to a
satisfactory degree of perfection the end
which God intends. Therefore, the riches
that economic-social developments constantly
increase ought to be so distributed among
individual persons and classes that the
common advantage of all, which Leo XIII had
praised, will be safeguarded; in other
words, that the common good of all society
will be kept inviolate. By this law of
social justice, one class is forbidden to
exclude the other from sharing in the
benefits. Hence the class of the wealthy
violates this law no less, when, as if free
from care on account of its wealth, it
thinks it the right order of things for it
to get everything and the worker nothing,
than does the non-owning working class when,
angered deeply at outraged justice and too
ready to assert wrongly the one right it is
conscious of, it demands for itself
everything as if produced by its own hands,
and attacks and seeks to abolish, therefore,
all property and returns or incomes, of
whatever kind they are or whatever the
function they perform in human society, that
have not been obtained by labor, and for no
other reason save that they are of such a
nature. And in this connection We must not
pass over the unwarranted and unmerited
appeal made by some to the Apostle when he
said: "If any man will not work neither let
him eat."[41] For the Apostle is passing
judgment on those who are unwilling to work,
although they can and ought to, and he
admonishes us that we ought diligently to
use our time and energies of body, and mind
and not be a burden to others when we can
provide for ourselves. But the Apostle in no
wise teaches that labor is the sole title to
a living or an income.[42]
58. To each,
therefore, must be given his own share of
goods, and the distribution of created
goods, which, as every discerning person
knows, is laboring today under the gravest
evils due to the huge disparity between the
few exceedingly rich and the unnumbered
propertyless, must be effectively called
back to and brought into conformity with the
norms of the common good, that is, social
justice.
59. The
redemption of the non-owning workers - this
is the goal that Our Predecessor declared
must necessarily be sought. And the point is
the more emphatically to be asserted and
more insistently repeated because the
commands of the Pontiff, salutary as they
are, have not infrequently been consigned to
oblivion either because they were
deliberately suppressed by silence or
thought impracticable although they both can
and ought to be put into effect. And these
commands have not lost their force and
wisdom for our time because that "pauperism"
which Leo XIII beheld in all its horror is
less widespread. Certainly the condition of
the workers has been improved and made more
equitable especially in the more civilized
and wealthy countries where the workers can
no longer be considered universally
overwhelmed with misery and lacking the
necessities of life. But since manufacturing
and industry have so rapidly pervaded and
occupied countless regions, not only in the
countries called new, but also in the realms
of the Far East that have been civilized
from antiquity, the number of the non-owning
working poor has increased enormously and
their groans cry to God from the earth.
Added to them is the huge army of rural wage
workers, pushed to the lowest level of
existence and deprived of all hope of ever
acquiring "some property in land,"[43] and,
therefore, permanently bound to the status
of non-owning worker unless suitable and
effective remedies are applied.
60. Yet while
it is true that the status of non owning
worker is to be carefully distinguished from
pauperism, nevertheless the immense
multitude of the non-owning workers on the
one hand and the enormous riches of certain
very wealthy men on the other establish an
unanswerable argument that the riches which
are so abundantly produced in our age of
"industrialism," as it is called, are not
rightly distributed and equitably made
available to the various classes of the
people.
61.
Therefore, with all our strength and effort
we must strive that at least in the future
the abundant fruits of production will
accrue equitably to those who are rich and
will be distributed in ample sufficiency
among the workers - not that these may
become remiss in work, for man is born to
labor as the bird to fly - but that they may
increase their property by thrift, that they
may bear, by wise management of this
increase in property, the burdens of family
life with greater ease and security, and
that, emerging from the insecure lot in life
in whose uncertainties non-owning workers
are cast, they may be able not only to
endure the vicissitudes of earthly existence
but have also assurance that when their
lives are ended they will provide in some
measure for those they leave after them.
62. All these
things which Our Predecessor has not only
suggested but clearly and openly proclaimed,
We emphasize with renewed insistence in our
present Encyclical; and unless utmost
efforts are made without delay to put them
into effect, let no one persuade himself
that public order, peace, and the
tranquillity of human society can be
effectively defended against agitators of
revolution.
63. As We
have already indicated, following in the
footsteps of Our Predecessor, it will be
impossible to put these principles into
practice unless the non-owning workers
through industry and thrift advance to the
state of possessing some little property.
But except from pay for work, from what
source can a man who has nothing else but
work from which to obtain food and the
necessaries of life set anything aside for
himself through practicing frugality? Let
us, therefore, explaining and developing
wherever necessary Leo XIII's teachings and
precepts, take up this question of wages and
salaries which he called one "of very great
importance."[44]
64. First of
all, those who declare that a contract of
hiring and being hired is unjust of its own
nature, and hence a partnership-contract
must take its place, are certainly in error
and gravely misrepresent Our Predecessor
whose Encyclical not only accepts working
for wages or salaries but deals at some
length with it regulation in accordance with
the rules of justice.
65. We
consider it more advisable, however, in the
present condition of human society that, so
far as is possible, the work-contract be
somewhat modified by a partnership-contract,
as is already being done in various ways and
with no small advantage to workers and
owners. Workers and other employees thus
become sharers in ownership or management or
participate in some fashion in the profits
received.
66. The just
amount of pay, however, must be calculated
not on a single basis but on several, as Leo
XIII already wisely declared in these words:
"To establish a rule of pay in accord with
justice, many factors must be taken into
account."[45]
67. By this
statement he plainly condemned the
shallowness of those who think that this
most difficult matter is easily solved by
the application of a single rule or measure
- and one quite false.
68. For they
are greatly in error who do not hesitate to
spread the principle that labor is worth and
must be paid as much as its products are
worth, and that consequently the one who
hires out his labor has the right to demand
all that is produced through his labor. How
far this is from the truth is evident from
that We have already explained in treating
of property and labor.
69. It is
obvious that, as in the case of ownership,
so in the case of work, especially work
hired out to others, there is a social
aspect also to be considered in addition to
the personal or individual aspect. For man's
productive effort cannot yield its fruits
unless a truly social and organic body
exists, unless a social and juridical order
watches over the exercise of work, unless
the various occupations, being
interdependent, cooperate with and mutually
complete one another, and, what is still
more important, unless mind, material
things, and work combine and form as it were
a single whole. Therefore, where the social
and individual nature of work is neglected,
it will be impossible to evaluate work
justly and pay it according to justice.
70.
Conclusions of the greatest importance
follow from this twofold character which
nature has impressed on human work, and it
is in accordance with these that wages ought
to be regulated and established.
71. In the
first place, the worker must be paid a wage
sufficient to support him and his
family.[46] That the rest of the family
should also contribute to the common
support, according to the capacity of each,
is certainly right, as can be observed
especially in the families of farmers, but
also in the families of many craftsmen and
small shopkeepers. But to abuse the years of
childhood and the limited strength of women
is grossly wrong. Mothers, concentrating on
household duties, should work primarily in
the home or in its immediate vicinity. It is
an intolerable abuse, and to be abolished at
all cost, for mothers on account of the
father's low wage to be forced to engage in
gainful occupations outside the home to the
neglect of their proper cares and duties,
especially the training of children. Every
effort must therefore be made that fathers
of families receive a wage large enough to
meet ordinary family needs adequately. But
if this cannot always be done under existing
circumstances, social justice demands that
changes be introduced as soon as possible
whereby such a wage will be assured to every
adult workingman. It will not be out of
place here to render merited praise to all,
who with a wise and useful purpose, have
tried and tested various ways of adjusting
the pay for work to family burdens in such a
way that, as these increase, the former may
be raised and indeed, if the contingency
arises, there may be enough to meet
extraordinary needs.
72. In
determining the amount of the wage, the
condition of a business and of the one
carrying it on must also be taken into
account; for it would be unjust to demand
excessive wages which a business cannot
stand without its ruin and consequent
calamity to the workers. If, however, a
business makes too little money, because of
lack of energy or lack of initiative or
because of indifference to technical and
economic progress, that must not be regarded
a just reason for reducing the compensation
of the workers. But if the business in
question is not making enough money to pay
the workers an equitable wage because it is
being crushed by unjust burdens or forced to
sell its product at less than a just price,
those who are thus the cause of the injury
are guilty of grave wrong, for they deprive
workers of their just wage and force them
under the pinch of necessity to accept a
wage less than fair.
73. Let,
then, both workers and employers strive with
united strength and counsel to overcome the
difficulties and obstacles and let a wise
provision on the part of public authority
aid them in so salutary a work. If, however,
matters come to an extreme crisis, it must
be finally considered whether the business
can continue or the workers are to be cared
for in some other way. In such a situation,
certainly most serious, a feeling of close
relationship and a Christian concord of
minds ought to prevail and function
effectively among employers and workers.
74. Lastly,
the amount of the pay must be adjusted to
the public economic good. We have shown
above how much it helps the common good for
workers and other employees, by setting
aside some part of their income which
remains after necessary expenditures, to
attain gradually to the possession of a
moderate amount of wealth. But another
point, scarcely less important, and
especially vital in our times, must not be
overlooked: namely, that the opportunity to
work be provided to those who are able and
willing to work. This opportunity depends
largely on the wage and salary rate, which
can help as long as it is kept within proper
limits, but which on the other hand can be
an obstacle if it exceeds these limits. For
everyone knows that an excessive lowering of
wages, or their increase beyond due measure,
causes unemployment. This evil, indeed,
especially as we see it prolonged and
injuring so many during the years of Our
Pontificate, has plunged workers into misery
and temptations, ruined the prosperity of
nations, and put in jeopardy the public
order, peace, and tranquillity of the whole
world. Hence it is contrary to social
justice when, for the sake of personal gain
and without regard for the common good,
wages and salaries are excessively lowered
or raised; and this same social justice
demands that wages and salaries be so
managed, through agreement of plans and
wills, in so far as can be done, as to offer
to the greatest possible number the
opportunity of getting work and obtaining
suitable means of livelihood.
75. A right
proportion among wages and salaries also
contributes directly to the same result; and
with this is closely connected a right
proportion in the prices at which the goods
are sold that are produced by the various
occupations, such as agriculture,
manufacturing, and others. If all these
relations are properly maintained, the
various occupations will combine and
coalesce into, as it were, a single body and
like members of the body mutually aid and
complete one another. For then only will the
social economy be rightly established and
attain its purposes when all and each are
supplied with all the goods that the wealth
and resources of nature, technical
achievement, and the social organization of
economic life can furnish. And these goods
ought indeed to be enough both to meet the
demands of necessity and decent comfort and
to advance people to that happier and fuller
condition of life which, when it is wisely
cared for, is not only no hindrance to
virtue but helps it greatly.[47]
76. What We
have thus far stated regarding an equitable
distribution of property and regarding just
wages concerns individual persons and only
indirectly touches social order, to the
restoration of which according to the
principles of sound philosophy and to its
perfection according to the sublime precepts
of the law of the Gospel, Our Predecessor,
Leo XIII, devoted all his thought and care.
77. Still, in
order that what he so happily initiated may
be solidly established, that what remains to
be done may be accomplished, and that even
more copious and richer benefits may accrue
to the family of mankind, two things are
especially necessary: reform of institutions
and correction of morals.
78. When we
speak of the reform of institutions, the
State comes chiefly to mind, not as if
universal well-being were to be expected
from its activity, but because things have
come to such a pass through the evil of what
we have termed "individualism" that,
following upon the overthrow and near
extinction of that rich social life which
was once highly developed through
associations of various kinds, there remain
virtually only individuals and the State.
This is to the great harm of the State
itself; for, with a structure of social
governance lost, and with the taking over of
all the burdens which the wrecked
associations once bore. the State has been
overwhelmed and crushed by almost infinite
tasks and duties.
79. As
history abundantly proves, it is true that
on account of changed conditions many things
which were done by small associations in
former times cannot be done now save by
large associations. Still, that most weighty
principle, which cannot be set aside or
changed, remains fixed and unshaken in
social philosophy: Just as it is gravely
wrong to take from individuals what they can
accomplish by their own initiative and
industry and give it to the community, so
also it is an injustice and at the same time
a grave evil and disturbance of right order
to assign to a greater and higher
association what lesser and subordinate
organizations can do. For every social
activity ought of its very nature to furnish
help to the members of the body social, and
never destroy and absorb them.
80. The
supreme authority of the State ought,
therefore, to let subordinate groups handle
matters and concerns of lesser importance,
which would otherwise dissipate its efforts
greatly. Thereby the State will more freely,
powerfully, and effectively do all those
things that belong to it alone because it
alone can do them: directing, watching,
urging, restraining, as occasion requires
and necessity demands. Therefore, those in
power should be sure that the more perfectly
a graduated order is kept among the various
associations, in observance of the principle
of "subsidiary function," the stronger
social authority and effectiveness will be
the happier and more prosperous the
condition of the State.
81. First and
foremost, the State and every good citizen
ought to look to and strive toward this end:
that the conflict between the hostile
classes be abolished and harmonious
cooperation of the Industries and
Professions be encouraged and promoted.
82. The
social policy of the State, therefore, must
devote itself to the re-establishment of the
Industries and Professions. In actual fact,
human society now, for the reason that it is
founded on classes with divergent aims and
hence opposed to one another and therefore
inclined to enmity and strife, continues to
be in a violent condition and is unstable
and uncertain.
83. Labor, as
Our Predecessor explained well in his
Encyclical,[48] is not a mere commodity. On
the contrary, the worker's human dignity in
it must be recognized. It therefore cannot
be bought and sold like a commodity.
Nevertheless, as the situation now stands,
hiring and offering for hire in the
so-called labor market separate men into two
divisions, as into battle lines, and the
contest between these divisions turns the
labor market itself almost into a
battlefield where, face to face, the
opposing lines struggle bitterly. Everyone
understands that this grave evil which is
plunging all human society to destruction
must be remedied as soon as possible. But
complete cure will not come until this
opposition has been abolished and
well-ordered members of the social body -
Industries and Professions - are constituted
in which men may have their place, not
according to the position each has in the
labor market but according to the respective
social functions which each performs. For
under nature's guidance it comes to pass
that just as those who are joined together
by nearness of habitation establish towns,
so those who follow the same industry or
profession - whether in the economic or
other field - form guilds or associations,
so that many are wont to consider these
self-governing organizations, if not
essential, at least natural to civil
society.
84. Because
order, as St. Thomas well explains,[49] is
unity arising from the harmonious
arrangement of many objects, a true, genuine
social order demands that the various
members of a society be united together by
some strong bond. This unifying force is
present not only in the producing of goods
or the rendering of services - in which the
employers and employees of an identical
Industry or Profession collaborate jointly -
but also in that common good, to achieve
which all Industries and Professions
together ought, each to the best of its
ability, to cooperate amicably. And this
unity will be the stronger and more
effective, the more faithfully individuals
and the Industries and Professions
themselves strive to do their work and excel
in it.
85. It is
easily deduced from what has been said that
the interests common to the whole Industry
or Profession should hold first place in
these guilds. The most important among these
interests is to promote the cooperation in
the highest degree of each industry and
profession for the sake of the common good
of the country. Concerning matters, however,
in which particular points, involving
advantage or detriment to employers or
workers, may require special care and
protection, the two parties, when these
cases arise, can deliberate separately or as
the situation requires reach a decision
separately.
86. The
teaching of Leo XIII on the form of
political government, namely, that men are
free to choose whatever form they please,
provided that proper regard is had for the
requirements of justice and of the common
good, is equally applicable in due
proportion, it is hardly necessary to say,
to the guilds of the various industries and
professions.[50]
87. Moreover,
just as inhabitants of a town are wont to
found associations with the widest diversity
of purposes, which each is quite free to
join or not, so those engaged in the same
industry or profession will combine with one
another into associations equally free for
purposes connected in some manner with the
pursuit of the calling itself. Since these
free associations are clearly and lucidly
explained by Our Predecessor of illustrious
memory, We consider it enough to emphasize
this one point: People are quite free not
only to found such associations, which are a
matter of private order and private right,
but also in respect to them "freely to adopt
the organization and the rules which they
judge most appropriate to achieve their
purpose."[51] The same freedom must be
asserted for founding associations that go
beyond the boundaries of individual
callings. And may these free organizations,
now flourishing and rejoicing in their
salutary fruits, set before themselves the
task of preparing the way, in conformity
with the mind of Christian social teaching,
for those larger and more important guilds,
Industries and Professions, which We
mentioned before, and make every possible
effort to bring them to realization.
88. Attention
must be given also to another matter that is
closely connected with the foregoing. Just
as the unity of human society cannot be
founded on an opposition of classes, so also
the right ordering of economic life cannot
be left to a free competition of forces. For
from this source, as from a poisoned spring,
have originated and spread all the errors of
individualist economic teaching. Destroying
through forgetfulness or ignorance the
social and moral character of economic life,
it held that economic life must be
considered and treated as altogether free
from and independent of public authority,
because in the market, i.e., in the free
struggle of competitors, it would have a
principle of self direction which governs it
much more perfectly than would the
intervention of any created intellect. But
free competition, while justified and
certainly useful provided it is kept within
certain limits, clearly cannot direct
economic life - a truth which the outcome of
the application in practice of the tenets of
this evil individualistic spirit has more
than sufficiently demonstrated. Therefore,
it is most necessary that economic life be
again subjected to and governed by a true
and effective directing principle. This
function is one that the economic
dictatorship which has recently displaced
free competition can still less perform,
since it is a headstrong power and a violent
energy that, to benefit people, needs to be
strongly curbed and wisely ruled. But it
cannot curb and rule itself. Loftier and
nobler principles - social justice and
social charity - must, therefore, be sought
whereby this dictatorship may be governed
firmly and fully. Hence, the institutions
themselves of peoples and, particularly
those of all social life, ought to be
penetrated with this justice, and it is most
necessary that it be truly effective, that
is, establish a juridical and social order
which will, as it were, give form and shape
to all economic life. Social charity,
moreover, ought to be as the soul of this
order, an order which public authority ought
to be ever ready effectively to protect and
defend. It will be able to do this the more
easily as it rids itself of those burdens
which, as We have stated above, are not
properly its own.
89.
Furthermore, since the various nations
largely depend on one another in economic
matters and need one another's help, they
should strive with a united purpose and
effort to promote by wisely conceived pacts
and institutions a prosperous and happy
international cooperation in economic life.
90. If the
members of the body social are, as was said,
reconstituted, and if the directing
principle of economic-social life is
restored, it will be possible to say in a
certain sense even of this body what the
Apostle says of the mystical body of Christ:
"The whole body (being closely joined and
knit together through every joint of the
system according to the functioning in due
measure of each single part) derives its
increase to the building up of itself in
love."[52]
91. Recently,
as all know, there has been inaugurated a
special system of syndicates and
corporations of the various callings which
in view of the theme of this Encyclical it
would seem necessary to describe here
briefly and comment upon appropriately.
92. The civil
authority itself constitutes the syndicate
as a juridical personality in such a manner
as to confer on it simultaneously a certain
monopoly-privilege, since only such a
syndicate, when thus approved, can maintain
the rights (according to the type of
syndicate) of workers or employers, and
since it alone can arrange for the placement
of labor and conclude so-termed labor
agreements. Anyone is free to join a
syndicate or not, and only within these
limits can this kind of syndicate be called
free; for syndical dues and special
assessments are exacted of absolutely all
members of every specified calling or
profession, whether they are workers or
employers; likewise all are bound by the
labor agreements made by the legally
recognized syndicate. Nevertheless, it has
been officially stated that this legally
recognized syndicate does not prevent the
existence, without legal status, however, of
other associations made up of persons
following the same calling.
93. The
associations, or corporations, are composed
of delegates from the two syndicates (that
is, of workers and employers) respectively
of the same industry or profession and, as
true and proper organs and institutions of
the State, they direct the syndicates and
coordinate their activities in matters of
common interest toward one and the same end.
94. Strikes
and lock-outs are forbidden; if the parties
cannot settle their dispute, public
authority intervenes.
95. Anyone
who gives even slight attention to the
matter will easily see what are the obvious
advantages in the system We have thus
summarily described: The various classes
work together peacefully, socialist
organizations and their activities are
repressed, and a special magistracy
exercises a governing authority. Yet lest We
neglect anything in a matter of such great
importance and that all points treated may
be properly connected with the more general
principles which We mentioned above and with
those which We intend shortly to add, We are
compelled to say that to Our certain
knowledge there are not wanting some who
fear that the State, instead of confining
itself as it ought to the furnishing of
necessary and adequate assistance, is
substituting itself for free activity; that
the new syndical and corporative order
savors too much of an involved and political
system of administration; and that (in spite
of those more general advantages mentioned
above, which are of course fully admitted)
it rather serves particular political ends
than leads to the reconstruction and
promotion of a better social order.
96. To
achieve this latter lofty aim, and in
particular to promote the common good truly
and permanently, We hold it is first and
above everything wholly necessary that God
bless it and, secondly, that all men of good
will work with united effort toward that
end. We are further convinced, as a
necessary consequence, that this end will be
attained the more certainly the larger the
number of those ready to contribute toward
it their technical, occupational, and social
knowledge and experience; and also, what is
more important, the greater the contribution
made thereto of Catholic principles and
their application, not indeed by Catholic
Action (which excludes strictly syndical or
political activities from its scope) but by
those sons of Ours whom Catholic Action
imbues with Catholic principles and trains
for carrying on an apostolate under the
leadership and teaching guidance of the
Church - of that Church which in this field
also that We have described, as in every
other field where moral questions are
involved and discussed, can never forget or
neglect through indifference its divinely
imposed mandate to be vigilant and to teach.
97. What We
have taught about the reconstruction and
perfection of social order can surely in no
wise be brought to realization without
reform of morality, the very record of
history clearly shows. For there was a
social order once which, although indeed not
perfect or in all respects ideal,
nevertheless, met in a certain measure the
requirements of right reason, considering
the conditions and needs of the time. If
that order has long since perished, that
surely did not happen because the order
could not have accommodated itself to
changed conditions and needs by development
and by a certain expansion, but rather
because men, hardened by too much love of
self, refused to open the order to the
increasing masses as they should have done,
or because, deceived by allurements of a
false freedom and other errors, they became
impatient of every authority and sought to
reject every form of control.
98. There
remains to Us, after again calling to
judgment the economic system now in force
and its most bitter accuser, Socialism, and
passing explicit and just sentence upon
them, to search out more thoroughly the root
of these many evils and to point out that
the first and most necessary remedy is a
reform of morals.
99. Important
indeed have the changes been which both the
economic system and Socialism have undergone
since Leo XIII's time.
100. That, in
the first place, the whole aspect of
economic life is vastly altered, is plain to
all. You know, Venerable Brethren and
Beloved Children, that the Encyclical of Our
Predecessor of happy memory had in view
chiefly that economic system, wherein,
generally, some provide capital while others
provide labor for a joint economic activity.
And in a happy phrase he described it thus:
"Neither capital can do without labor, nor
labor without capital."[53]
101. With all
his energy Leo XIII sought to adjust this
economic system according to the norms of
right order; hence, it is evident that this
system is not to be condemned in itself. And
surely it is not of its own nature vicious.
But it does violate right order when capital
hires workers, that is, the non-owning
working class, with a view to and under such
terms that it directs business and even the
whole economic system according to its own
will and advantage, scorning the human
dignity of the workers, the social character
of economic activity and social justice
itself, and the common good.
102. Even
today this is not, it is true, the only
economic system in force everywhere; for
there is another system also, which still
embraces a huge mass of humanity,
significant in numbers and importance, as
for example, agriculture wherein the greater
portion of mankind honorably and honestly
procures its livelihood. This group, too, is
being crushed with hardships and with
difficulties, to which Our Predecessor
devotes attention in several places in his
Encyclical and which We Ourselves have
touched upon more than once in Our present
Letter.
103. But,
with the diffusion of modern industry
throughout the whole world, the "capitalist"
economic regime has spread everywhere to
such a degree, particularly since the
publication of Leo XIII's Encyclical, that
it has invaded and pervaded the economic and
social life of even those outside its orbit
and is unquestionably impressing on it its
advantages, disadvantages and vices, and, in
a sense, is giving it its own shape and
form.
104.
Accordingly, when directing Our special
attention to the changes which the
capitalist economic system has undergone
since Leo's time, We have in mind the good
not only of those who dwell in regions given
over to "capital" and industry, but of all
mankind.
105. In the
first place, it is obvious that not only is
wealth concentrated in our times but an
immense power and despotic economic
dictatorship is consolidated in the hands of
a few, who often are not owners but only the
trustees and managing directors of invested
funds which they administer according to
their own arbitrary will and pleasure.
106. This
dictatorship is being most forcibly
exercised by those who, since they hold the
money and completely control it, control
credit also and rule the lending of money.
Hence they regulate the flow, so to speak,
of the life-blood whereby the entire
economic system lives, and have so firmly in
their grasp the soul, as it were, of
economic life that no one can breathe
against their will.
107. This
concentration of power and might, the
characteristic mark, as it were, of
contemporary economic life, is the fruit
that the unlimited freedom of struggle among
competitors has of its own nature produced,
and which lets only the strongest survive;
and this is often the same as saying, those
who fight the most violently, those who give
least heed to their conscience.
108. This
accumulation of might and of power generates
in turn three kinds of conflict. First,
there is the struggle for economic supremacy
itself; then there is the bitter fight to
gain supremacy over the State in order to
use in economic struggles its resources and
authority; finally there is conflict between
States themselves, not only because
countries employ their power and shape their
policies to promote every economic advantage
of their citizens, but also because they
seek to decide political controversies that
arise among nations through the use of their
economic supremacy and strength.
109. The
ultimate consequences of the individualist
spirit in economic life are those which you
yourselves, Venerable Brethren and Beloved
Children, see and deplore: Free competition
has destroyed itself; economic dictatorship
has supplanted the free market; unbridled
ambition for power has likewise succeeded
greed for gain; all economic life has become
tragically hard, inexorable, and cruel. To
these are to be added the grave evils that
have resulted from an intermingling and
shameful confusion of the functions and
duties of public authority with those of the
economic sphere - such as, one of the worst,
the virtual degradation of the majesty of
the State, which although it ought to sit on
high like a queen and supreme arbitress,
free from all partiality and intent upon the
one common good and justice, is become a
slave, surrendered and delivered to the
passions and greed of men. And as to
international relations, two different
streams have issued from the one
fountain-head: On the one hand, economic
nationalism or even economic imperialism; on
the other, a no less deadly and accursed
internationalism of finance or international
imperialism whose country is where profit
is.
110. In the
second part of this Encyclical where We have
presented Our teaching, We have described
the remedies for these great evils so
explicitly that We consider it sufficient at
this point to recall them briefly. Since the
present system of economy is founded chiefly
upon ownership and labor, the principles of
right reason, that is, of Christian social
philosophy, must be kept in mind regarding
ownership and labor and their association
together, and must be put into actual
practice. First, so as to avoid the reefs of
individualism and collectivism. the twofold
character, that is individual and social,
both of capital or ownership and of work or
labor must be given due and rightful weight.
Relations of one to the other must be made
to conform to the laws of strictest justice
- commutative justice, as it is called -
with the support, however, of Christian
charity. Free competition, kept within
definite and due limits, and still more
economic dictatorship, must be effectively
brought under public authority in these
matters which pertain to the latter's
function. The public institutions
themselves, of peoples, moreover, ought to
make all human society conform to the needs
of the common good; that is, to the norm of
social justice. If this is done, that most
important division of social life, namely,
economic activity, cannot fail likewise to
return to right and sound order.
111.
Socialism, against which Our Predecessor,
Leo XIII, had especially to inveigh, has
since his time changed no less profoundly
than the form of economic life. For
Socialism, which could then be termed almost
a single system and which maintained
definite teachings reduced into one body of
doctrine, has since then split chiefly into
two sections, often opposing each other and
even bitterly hostile, without either one
however abandoning a position fundamentally
contrary to Christian truth that was
characteristic of Socialism.
112. One
section of Socialism has undergone almost
the same change that the capitalistic
economic system, as We have explained above,
has undergone. It has sunk into Communism.
Communism teaches and seeks two objectives:
Unrelenting class warfare and absolute
extermination of private ownership. Not
secretly or by hidden methods does it do
this, but publicly, openly, and by employing
every and all means, even the most violent.
To achieve these objectives there is nothing
which it does not dare, nothing for which it
has respect or reverence; and when it has
come to power, it is incredible and
portentlike in its cruelty and inhumanity.
The horrible slaughter and destruction
through which it has laid waste vast regions
of eastern Europe and Asia are the evidence;
how much an enemy and how openly hostile it
is to Holy Church and to God Himself is,
alas, too well proved by facts and fully
known to all. Although We, therefore, deem
it superfluous to warn upright and faithful
children of the Church regarding the impious
and iniquitous character of Communism, yet
We cannot without deep sorrow contemplate
the heedlessness of those who apparently
make light of these impending dangers, and
with sluggish inertia allow the widespread
propagation of doctrine which seeks by
violence and slaughter to destroy society
altogether. All the more gravely to be
condemned is the folly of those who neglect
to remove or change the conditions that
inflame the minds of peoples, and pave the
way for the overthrow and destruction of
society.
113. The
other section, which has kept the name
Socialism, is surely more moderate. It not
only professes the rejection of violence but
modifies and tempers to some degree, if it
does not reject entirely, the class struggle
and the abolition of private ownership. One
might say that, terrified by its own
principles and by the conclusions drawn
therefrom by Communism, Socialism inclines
toward and in a certain measure approaches
the truths which Christian tradition has
always held sacred; for it cannot be denied
that its demands at times come very near
those that Christian reformers of society
justly insist upon.
114. For if
the class struggle abstains from enmities
and mutual hatred, it gradually changes into
an honest discussion of differences founded
on a desire for justice, and if this is not
that blessed social peace which we all seek,
it can and ought to be the point of
departure from which to move forward to the
mutual cooperation of the Industries and
Professions. So also the war declared on
private ownership, more and more abated, is
being so restricted that now, finally, not
the possession itself of the means of
production is attacked but rather a kind of
sovereignty over society which ownership
has, contrary to all right, seized and
usurped. For such sovereignty belongs in
reality not to owners but to the public
authority. If the foregoing happens, it can
come even to the point that imperceptibly
these ideas of the more moderate socialism
will no longer differ from the desires and
demands of those who are striving to remold
human society on the basis of Christian
principles. For certain kinds of property,
it is rightly contended, ought to be
reserved to the State since they carry with
them a dominating power so great that cannot
without danger to the general welfare be
entrusted to private individuals.
115. Such
just demands and desire have nothing in them
now which is inconsistent with Christian
truth, and much less are they special to
Socialism. Those who work solely toward such
ends have, therefore, no reason to become
socialists.
116. Yet let
no one think that all the socialist groups
or factions that are not communist have,
without exception, recovered their senses to
this extent either in fact or in name. For
the most part they do not reject the class
struggle or the abolition of ownership, but
only in some degree modify them. Now if
these false principles are modified and to
some extent erased from the program, the
question arises, or rather is raised without
warrant by some, whether the principles of
Christian truth cannot perhaps be also
modified to some degree and be tempered so
as to meet Socialism half-way and, as it
were, by a middle course, come to agreement
with it. There are some allured by the
foolish hope that socialists in this way
will be drawn to us. A vain hope! Those who
want to be apostles among socialists ought
to profess Christian truth whole and entire,
openly and sincerely, and not connive at
error in any way. If they truly wish to be
heralds of the Gospel, let them above all
strive to show to socialists that socialist
claims, so far as they are just, are far
more strongly supported by the principles of
Christian faith and much more effectively
promoted through the power of Christian
charity.
117. But what
if Socialism has really been so tempered and
modified as to the class struggle and
private ownership that there is in it no
longer anything to be censured on these
points? Has it thereby renounced its
contradictory nature to the Christian
religion? This is the question that holds
many minds in suspense. And numerous are the
Catholics who, although they clearly
understand that Christian principles can
never be abandoned or diminished seem to
turn their eyes to the Holy See and
earnestly beseech Us to decide whether this
form of Socialism has so far recovered from
false doctrines that it can be accepted
without the sacrifice of any Christian
principle and in a certain sense be
baptized. That We, in keeping with Our
fatherly solicitude, may answer their
petitions, We make this pronouncement:
Whether considered as a doctrine, or an
historical fact, or a movement, Socialism,
if it remains truly Socialism, even after it
has yielded to truth and justice on the
points which we have mentioned, cannot be
reconciled with the teachings of the
Catholic Church because its concept of
society itself is utterly foreign to
Christian truth.
118. For,
according to Christian teaching, man,
endowed with a social nature, is placed on
this earth so that by leading a life in
society and under an authority ordained of
God[54] he may fully cultivate and develop
all his faculties unto the praise and glory
of his Creator; and that by faithfully
fulfilling the duties of his craft or other
calling he may obtain for himself temporal
and at the same time eternal happiness.
Socialism, on the other hand, wholly
ignoring and indifferent to this sublime end
of both man and society, affirms that human
association has been instituted for the sake
of material advantage alone.
119. Because
of the fact that goods are produced more
efficiently by a suitable division of labor
than by the scattered efforts of
individuals, socialists infer that economic
activity, only the material ends of which
enter into their thinking, ought of
necessity to be carried on socially. Because
of this necessity, they hold that men are
obliged, with respect to the producing of
goods, to surrender and subject themselves
entirely to society. Indeed, possession of
the greatest possible supply of things that
serve the advantages of this life is
considered of such great importance that the
higher goods of man, liberty not excepted,
must take a secondary place and even be
sacrificed to the demands of the most
efficient production of goods. This damage
to human dignity, undergone in the
"socialized" process of production, will be
easily offset, they say, by the abundance of
socially produced goods which will pour out
in profusion to individuals to be used
freely at their pleasure for comforts and
cultural development. Society, therefore, as
Socialism conceives it, can on the one hand
neither exist nor be thought of without an
obviously excessive use of force; on the
other hand, it fosters a liberty no less
false, since there is no place in it for
true social authority, which rests not on
temporal and material advantages but
descends from God alone, the Creator and
last end of all things.[55]
120. If
Socialism, like all errors, contains some
truth (which, moreover, the Supreme Pontiffs
have never denied), it is based nevertheless
on a theory of human society peculiar to
itself and irreconcilable with true
Christianity. Religious socialism, Christian
socialism, are contradictory terms; no one
can be at the same time a good Catholic and
a true socialist.
121. All
these admonitions which have been renewed
and confirmed by Our solemn authority must
likewise be applied to a certain new kind of
socialist activity, hitherto little known
but now carried on among many socialist
groups. It devotes itself above all to the
training of the mind and character. Under
the guise of affection it tries in
particular to attract children of tender age
and win them to itself, although it also
embraces the whole population in its scope
in order finally to produce true socialists
who would shape human society to the tenets
of Socialism.
122. Since in
Our Encyclical, The Christian Education
of Youth,[56] We have fully taught the
principles that Christian education insists
on and the ends it pursues, the
contradiction between these principles and
ends and the activities and aims of this
socialism that is pervading morality and
culture is so clear and evident that no
demonstration is required here. But they
seem to ignore or underestimate the grave
dangers that it carries with it who think it
of no importance courageously and zealously
to resist them according to the gravity of
the situation. It belongs to Our Pastoral
Office to warn these persons of the grave
and imminent evil: let all remember that
Liberalism is the father of this Socialism
that is pervading morality and culture and
that Bolshevism will be its heir.
123.
Accordingly, Venerable Brethren, you can
well understand with what great sorrow We
observe that not a few of Our sons, in
certain regions especially, although We
cannot be convinced that they have given up
the true faith and right will, have deserted
the camp of the Church and gone over to the
ranks of Socialism, some to glory openly in
the name of socialist and to profess
socialist doctrines, others through
thoughtlessness or even, almost against
their wills to join associations which are
socialist by profession or in fact.
124. In the
anxiety of Our paternal solicitude, We give
Ourselves to reflection and try to discover
how it could happen that they should go so
far astray and We seem to hear what many of
them answer and plead in excuse: The Church
and those proclaiming attachment to the
Church favor the rich, neglect the workers
and have no concern for them; therefore, to
look after themselves they had to join the
ranks of socialism .
125. It is
certainly most lamentable, Venerable
Brethren, that there have been, nay, that
even now there are men who, although
professing to be Catholics, are almost
completely unmindful of that sublime law of
justice and charity that binds us not only
to render to everyone what is his but to
succor brothers in need as Christ the Lord
Himself,[57] and - what is worse - out of
greed for gain do not scruple to exploit the
workers. Even more, there are men who abuse
religion itself, and under its name try to
hide their unjust exactions in order to
protect themselves from the manifestly just
demands of the workers. The conduct of such
We shall never cease to censure gravely. For
they are the reason why the Church could,
even though undeservedly, have the
appearance of and be charged with taking the
part of the rich and with being quite
unmoved by the necessities and hardships of
those who have been deprived, as it were, of
their natural inheritance. The whole history
of the Church plainly demonstrates that such
appearances are unfounded and such charges
unjust. The Encyclical itself, whose
anniversary we are celebrating, is clearest
proof that it is the height of injustice to
hurl these calumnies and reproaches at the
Church and her teaching.
126. Although
pained by the injustice and downcast in
fatherly sorrow, it is so far from Our
thought to repulse or to disown children who
have been miserably deceived and have
strayed so far from the truth and salvation
that We cannot but invite them with all
possible solicitude to return to the
maternal bosom of the Church. May they lend
ready ears to Our voice, may they return
whence they have left, to the home that is
truly their Father's, and may they stand
firm there where their own place is, in the
ranks of those who, zealously following the
admonitions which Leo promulgated and We
have solemnly repeated, are striving to
restore society according to the mind of the
Church on the firmly established basis of
social justice and social charity. And let
them be convinced that nowhere, even on
earth, can they find full happiness save
with Him who, being rich, became poor for
our sakes that through His poverty we might
become rich,[58] Who was poor and in labors
from His youth, Who invited to Himself all
that labor and are heavily burdened that He
might refresh them fully in the love of His
heart,[59] and Who, lastly, without any
respect for persons will require more of
them to whom more has been given[60] and
"will render to everyone according to his
conduct."[61]
127. Yet, if
we look into the matter more carefully and
more thoroughly, we shall clearly perceive
that, preceding this ardently desired social
restoration, there must be a renewal of the
Christian spirit, from which so many
immersed in economic life have, far and
wide, unhappily fallen away, lest all our
efforts be wasted and our house be builded
not on a rock but on shifting sand.[62]
128. And so,
Venerable Brethren and Beloved Sons, having
surveyed the present economic system, We
have found it laboring under the gravest of
evils. We have also summoned Communism and
Socialism again to judgment and have found
all their forms, even the most modified, to
wander far from the precepts of the Gospel.
129.
"Wherefore," to use the words of Our
Predecessor, "if human society is to be
healed, only a return to Christian life and
institutions will heal it."[63] For this
alone can provide effective remedy for that
excessive care for passing things that is
the origin of all vices; and this alone can
draw away men's eyes, fascinated by and
wholly fixed on the changing things of the
world, and raise them toward Heaven. Who
would deny that human society is in most
urgent need of this cure now?
130. Minds of
all, it is true, are affected almost solely
by temporal upheavals, disasters, and
calamities. But if we examine things
critically with Christian eyes, as we
should, what are all these compared with the
loss of souls? Yet it is not rash by any
means to say that the whole scheme of social
and economic life is now such as to put in
the way of vast numbers of mankind most
serious obstacles which prevent them from
caring for the one thing necessary; namely,
their eternal salvation .
131. We, made
Shepherd and Protector by the Prince of
Shepherds, Who Redeemed them by His Blood,
of a truly innumerable flock, cannot hold
back Our tears when contemplating this
greatest of their dangers. Nay rather, fully
mindful of Our pastoral office and with
paternal solicitude, We are continually
meditating on how We can help them; and We
have summoned to Our aid the untiring zeal
of others who are concerned on grounds of
justice or charity. For what will it profit
men to become expert in more wisely using
their wealth, even to gaining the whole
world, if thereby they suffer the loss of
their souls?[64] What will it profit to
teach them sound principles of economic life
if in unbridled and sordid greed they let
themselves be swept away by their passion
for property, so that "hearing the
commandments of the Lord they do all things
contrary."[65]
132. The root
and font of this defection in economic and
social life from the Christian law, and of
the consequent apostasy of great numbers of
workers from the Catholic faith, are the
disordered passions of the soul, the sad
result of original sin which has so
destroyed the wonderful harmony of man's
faculties that, easily led astray by his
evil desires, he is strongly incited to
prefer the passing goods of this world to
the lasting goods of Heaven. Hence arises
that unquenchable thirst for riches and
temporal goods, which has at all times
impelled men to break God's laws and trample
upon the rights of their neighbors, but
which, on account of the present system of
economic life, is laying far more numerous
snares for human frailty. Since the
instability of economic life, and especially
of its structure, exacts of those engaged in
it most intense and unceasing effort, some
have become so hardened to the stings of
conscience as to hold that they are allowed,
in any manner whatsoever, to increase their
profits and use means, fair or foul, to
protect their hard-won wealth against sudden
changes of fortune. The easy gains that a
market unrestricted by any law opens to
everybody attracts large numbers to buying
and selling goods, and they, their one aim
being to make quick profits with the least
expenditure of work, raise or lower prices
by their uncontrolled business dealings so
rapidly according to their own caprice and
greed that they nullify the wisest forecasts
of producers. The laws passed to promote
corporate business, while dividing and
limiting the risk of business, have given
occasion to the most sordid license. For We
observe that consciences are little affected
by this reduced obligation of
accountability; that furthermore, by hiding
under the shelter of a joint name, the worst
of injustices and frauds are penetrated; and
that, too, directors of business companies,
forgetful of their trust, betray the rights
of those whose savings they have undertaken
to administer. Lastly, We must not omit to
mention those crafty men who, wholly
unconcerned about any honest usefulness of
their work, do not scruple to stimulate the
baser human desires and, when they are
aroused, use them for their own profit.
133. Strict
and watchful moral restraint enforced
vigorously by governmental authority could
have banished these enormous evils and even
forestalled them; this restraint, however,
has too often been sadly lacking. For since
the seeds of a new form of economy were
bursting forth just when the principles of
rationalism had been implanted and rooted in
many minds, there quickly developed a body
of economic teaching far removed from the
true moral law, and, as a result, completely
free rein was given to human passions.
134. Thus it
came to pass that many, much more than ever
before, were solely concerned with
increasing their wealth by any means
whatsoever, and that in seeking their own
selfish interests before everything else
they had no conscience about committing even
the gravest of crimes against others. Those
first entering upon this broad way that
leads to destruction[66] easily found
numerous imitators of their iniquity by the
example of their manifest success, by their
insolent display of wealth, by their
ridiculing the conscience of others, who, as
they said, were troubled by silly scruples,
or lastly by crushing more conscientious
competitors.
135. With the
rulers of economic life abandoning the right
road, it was easy for the rank and file of
workers everywhere to rush headlong also
into the same chasm; and all the more so,
because very many managements treated their
workers like mere tools, with no concern at
all for their souls, without indeed even the
least thought of spiritual things. Truly the
mind shudders at the thought of the grave
dangers to which the morals of workers
(particularly younger workers) and the
modesty of girls and women are exposed in
modern factories; when we recall how often
the present economic scheme, and
particularly the shameful housing
conditions, create obstacles to the family
bond and normal family life; when we
remember how many obstacles are put in the
way of the proper observance of Sundays and
Holy Days; and when we reflect upon the
universal weakening of that truly Christian
sense through which even rude and unlettered
men were wont to value higher things, and
upon its substitution by the single
preoccupation of getting in any way
whatsoever one's daily bread. And thus
bodily labor, which Divine Providence
decreed to be performed, even after original
sin, for the good at once of man's body and
soul, is being everywhere changed into an
instrument of perversion; for dead matter
comes forth from the factory ennobled, while
men there are corrupted and degraded.
136. No
genuine cure can be furnished for this
lamentable ruin of souls, which, so long as
it continues, will frustrate all efforts to
regenerate society, unless men return openly
and sincerely to the teaching of the Gospel,
to the precepts of Him Who alone has the
words of everlasting life,[67] words which
will never pass away, even if Heaven and
earth will pass away.[68] All experts in
social problems are seeking eagerly a
structure so fashioned in accordance with
the norms of reason that it can lead
economic life back to sound and right order.
But this order, which We Ourselves ardently
long for and with all Our efforts promote,
will be wholly defective and incomplete
unless all the activities of men
harmoniously unite to imitate and attain, in
so far as it lies within human strength, the
marvelous unity of the Divine plan. We mean
that perfect order which the Church with
great force and power preaches and which
right human reason itself demands, that all
things be directed to God as the first and
supreme end of all created activity, and
that all created good under God be
considered as mere instruments to be used
only in so far as they conduce to the
attainment of the supreme end. Nor is it to
be thought that gainful occupations are
thereby belittled or judged less consonant
with human dignity; on the contrary, we are
taught to recognize in them with reverence
the manifest will of the Divine Creator Who
placed man upon the earth to work it and use
it in a multitude of ways for his needs.
Those who are engaged in producing goods,
therefore, are not forbidden to increase
their fortune in a just and lawful manner;
for it is only fair that he who renders
service to the community and makes it richer
should also, through the increased wealth of
the community, be made richer himself
according to his position, provided that all
these things be sought with due respect for
the laws of God and without impairing the
rights of others and that they be employed
in accordance with faith and right reason.
If these principles are observed by
everyone, everywhere, and always, not only
the production and acquisition of goods but
also the use of wealth, which now is seen to
be so often contrary to right order, will be
brought back soon within the bounds of
equity and just distribution. The sordid
love of wealth, which is the shame and great
sin of our age, will be opposed in actual
fact by the gentle yet effective law of
Christian moderation which commands man to
seek first the Kingdom of God and His
justice, with the assurance that, by virtue
of God's kindness and unfailing promise,
temporal goods also, in so far as he has
need of them, shall be given him
besides.[69]
137. But in
effecting all this, the law of charity,
"which is the bond of perfection,"[70] must
always take a leading role. How completely
deceived, therefore, are those rash
reformers who concern themselves with the
enforcement of justice alone - and this,
commutative justice - and in their pride
reject the assistance of charity!
Admittedly, no vicarious charity can
substitute for justice which is due as an
obligation and is wrongfully denied. Yet
even supposing that everyone should finally
receive all that is due him, the widest
field for charity will always remain open.
For justice alone can, if faithfully
observed, remove the causes of social
conflict but can never bring about union of
minds and hearts. Indeed all the
institutions for the establishment of peace
and the promotion of mutual help among men,
however perfect these may seem, have the
principal foundation of their stability in
the mutual bond of minds and hearts whereby
the members are united with one another. If
this bond is lacking, the best of
regulations come to naught, as we have
learned by too frequent experience. And so,
then only will true cooperation be possible
for a single common good when the
constituent parts of society deeply feel
themselves members of one great family and
children of the same Heavenly Father; nay,
that they are one body in Christ, "but
severally members one of another,"[71] so
that "if one member suffers anything, all
the members suffer with it."[72] For then
the rich and others in positions of power
will change their former indifference toward
their poorer brothers into a solicitous and
active love, listen with kindliness to their
just demands, and freely forgive their
possible mistakes and faults. And the
workers, sincerely putting aside every
feeling of hatred or envy which the
promoters of social conflict so cunningly
exploit, will not only accept without rancor
the place in human society assigned them by
Divine Providence, but rather will hold it
in esteem, knowing well that everyone
according to his function and duty is
toiling usefully and honorably for the
common good and is following closely in the
footsteps of Him Who, being in the form of
God, willed to be a carpenter among men and
be known as the son of a carpenter.
138.
Therefore, out of this new diffusion
throughout the world of the spirit of the
Gospel, which is the spirit of Christian
moderation and universal charity, We are
confident there will come that longed-for
and full restoration of human society in
Christ, and that "Peace of Christ in the
Kingdom of Christ," to accomplish which,
from the very beginning of Our Pontificate,
We firmly determined and resolved within Our
heart to devote all Our care and all Our
pastoral solicitude,[73] and toward this
same highly important and most necessary end
now, you also, Venerable Brethren, who with
Vs rule the Church of God under the mandate
of the Holy Ghost,[74] are earnestly toiling
with wholly praiseworthy zeal in all parts
of the world, even in the regions of the
holy missions to the infidels. Let
well-merited acclamations of praise be
bestowed upon you and at the same time upon
all those, both clergy and laity, who We
rejoice to see, are daily participating and
valiantly helping in this same great work,
Our beloved sons engaged in Catholic Action,
who with a singular zeal are undertaking
with Us the solution of the social problems
in so far as by virtue of her divine
institution this is proper to and devolves
upon the Church. All these We urge in the
Lord, again and again, to spare no labors
and let no difficulties conquer them, but
rather to become day by day more courageous
and more valiant.[75] Arduous indeed is the
task which We propose to them, for We know
well that on both sides, both among the
upper and the lower classes of society,
there are many obstacles and barriers to be
overcome. Let them not, however, lose heart;
to face bitter combats is a mark of
Christians, and to endure grave labors to
the end is a mark of them who, as good
soldiers of Christ,[76] follow Him closely.
139. Relying
therefore solely on the all-powerful aid of
Him "Who wishes all men to be saved,"[77]
let us strive with all our strength to help
those unhappy souls who have turned from God
and, drawing them away from the temporal
cares in which they are too deeply immersed,
let us teach them to aspire with confidence
to the things that are eternal. Sometimes
this will be achieved much more easily than
seems possible at first sight to expect. For
if wonderful spiritual forces lie hidden,
like sparks beneath ashes, within the secret
recesses of even the most abandoned man -
certain proof that his soul is naturally
Christian - how much the more in the hearts
of those many upon many who have been led
into error rather through ignorance or
environment.
140.
Moreover, the ranks of the workers
themselves are already giving happy and
promising signs of a social reconstruction.
To Our soul's great joy, We see in these
ranks also the massed companies of young
workers, who are receiving the counsel of
Divine Grace with willing ears and striving
with marvelous zeal to gain their comrades
for Christ. No less praise must be accorded
to the leaders of workers' organizations
who, disregarding their own personal
advantage and concerned solely about the
good of their fellow members, are striving
prudently to harmonize the just demands of
their members with the prosperity of their
whole occupation and also to promote these
demands, and who do not let themselves be
deterred from so noble a service by any
obstacle or suspicion. Also, as anyone may
see, many young men, who by reason of their
talent or wealth will soon occupy high
places among the leaders of society, are
studying social problems with deeper
interest, and they arouse the joyful hope
that they will dedicate themselves wholly to
the restoration of society.
141. The
present state of affairs, Venerable
Brethren, clearly indicates the way in which
We ought to proceed. For We are now
confronted, as more than once before in the
history of the Church, with a world that in
large part has almost fallen back into
paganism. That these whole classes of men
may be brought back to Christ Whom they have
denied, we must recruit and train from among
them, themselves, auxiliary soldiers of the
Church who know them well and their minds
and wishes, and can reach their hearts with
a tender brotherly love. The first and
immediate apostles to the workers ought to
be workers; the apostles to those who follow
industry and trade ought to be from among
them themselves.
142. It is
chiefly your duty, Venerable Brethren, and
of your clergy, to search diligently for
these lay apostles both of workers and of
employers, to select them with prudence, and
to train and instruct them properly. A
difficult task, certainly, is thus imposed
on priests, and to meet it, all who are
growing up as the hope of the Church, must
be duly prepared by an intensive study of
the social question. Especially is it
necessary that those whom you intend to
assign in particular to this work should
demonstrate that they are men possessed of
the keenest sense of justice, who will
resist with true manly courage the dishonest
demands or the unjust acts of anyone, who
will excel in the prudence and judgment
which avoids every extreme, and, above all,
who will be deeply permeated by the charity
of Christ, which alone has the power to
subdue firmly but gently the hearts and
wills of men to the laws of justice and
equity. Upon this road so often tried by
happy experience, there is no reason why we
should hesitate to go forward with all
speed.
143. These
Our Beloved Sons who are chosen for so great
a work, We earnestly exhort in the Lord to
give themselves wholly to the training of
the men committed to their care, and in the
discharge of this eminently priestly and
apostolic duty to make proper use of the
resources of Christian education by teaching
youth, forming Christian organizations, and
founding study groups guided by principles
in harmony with the Faith. But above all,
let them hold in high esteem and assiduously
employ for the good of their disciples that
most valuable means of both personal and
social restoration which, as We taught in
Our Encyclical, Mens Nostra,[78] is
to be found in the Spiritual Exercises. In
that Letter We expressly mentioned and
warmly recommended not only the Spiritual
Exercises for all the laity, but also the
highly beneficial Workers' Retreats. For in
that school of the spirit, not only are the
best of Christians developed but true
apostles also are trained for every
condition of life and are enkindled with the
fire of the heart of Christ. From this
school they will go forth as did the
Apostles from the Upper Room of Jerusalem,
strong in faith, endowed with an invincible
steadfastness in persecution, burning with
zeal, interested solely in spreading
everywhere the Kingdom of Christ.
144.
Certainly there is the greatest need now of
such valiant soldiers of Christ who will
work with all their strength to keep the
human family safe from the dire ruin into
which it would be plunged were the teachings
of the Gospel to be flouted, and that order
of things permitted to prevail which
tramples underfoot no less the laws of
nature than those of God. The Church of
Christ, built upon an unshakable rock, has
nothing to fear for herself, as she knows
for a certainty that the gates of hell shall
never prevail against her.[79] Rather, she
knows full well, through the experience of
many centuries, that she is wont to come
forth from the most violent storms stronger
than ever and adorned with new triumphs. Yet
her maternal heart cannot but be moved by
the countless evils with which so many
thousands would be afflicted during storms
of this kind, and above all by the
consequent enormous injury to spiritual life
which would work eternal ruin to so many
souls redeemed by the Blood of Jesus Christ.
145. To ward
off such great evils from human society
nothing, therefore, is to be left untried;
to this end may all our labors turn, to this
all our energies, to this our fervent and
unremitting prayers to God! For with the
assistance of Divine Grace the fate of the
human family rests in our hands.
146.
Venerable Brethren and Beloved Sons, let us
not permit the children of this world to
appear wiser in their generation than we who
by the Divine Goodness are the children of
the light.[80] We find them, indeed,
selecting and training with the greatest
shrewdness alert and resolute devotees who
spread their errors ever wider day by day
through all classes of men and in every part
of the world. And whenever they undertake to
attack the Church of Christ more violently,
We see them put aside their internal
quarrels, assembling in fully harmony in a
single battle line with a completely united
effort, and work to achieve their common
purpose.
147. Surely
there is not one that does not know how many
and how great are the works that the
tireless zeal of Catholics is striving
everywhere to carry out, both for social and
economic welfare as well as in the fields of
education and religion. But this admirable
and unremitting activity not infrequently
shows less effectiveness because of the
dispersion of its energies in too many
different directions. Therefore, let all men
of good will stand united, all who under the
Shepherds of the Church wish to fight this
good and peaceful battle of Christ; and
under the leadership and teaching guidance
of the Church let all strive according to
the talent, powers, and position of each to
contribute something to the Christian
reconstruction of human society which Leo
XIII inaugurated through his immortal
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
seeking not themselves and their own
interests, but those of Jesus Christ,[81]
not trying to press at all costs their own
counsels, but ready to sacrifice them,
however excellent, if the greater common
good should seem to require it, so that in
all and above all Christ may reign, Christ
may command to Whom be "honor and glory and
dominion forever and ever."[82]
148. That
this may happily come to pass, to all of
you, Venerable Brethren and Beloved
Children, who are members of the vast
Catholic family entrusted to Us, but with
the especial affection of Our heart to
workers and to all others engaged in manual
occupations, committed to us more urgently
by Divine Providence, and to Christian
employers and managements, with paternal
love We impart the Apostolic Benediction.
Given at
Rome, at Saint Peter's, the fifteenth day of
May, in the year 1931, the tenth year of Our
Pontificate.
PIUS XI
1.
Encyclical, Arcanum, Feb. 10, 1880.
2.
Encyclical, Diuturnum, June 20, 1881.
3.
Encyclical, Immortale Dei, Nov. 1,
1885.
4.
Encyclical, Sapientiae Christianae,
Jan. 10, 1890.
5.
Encyclical, Quod Apostolici Muneris,
Dec. 28, 1878.
6.
Encyclical, Libertas, June 20, 1888.
7.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
May 15, 1891, 3.
8.
Encyclical, On the Conditions of Workers,
cf. 24.
9.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
cf. 15.
10.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
cf. 6.
11.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
24.
12. Cf. Matt.
7:29.
13.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
4.
14. St.
Ambrose, De excessu fratris sui Satyri
1, 44.
15.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
25.
16. Let it be
sufficient to mention some of these only:
Leo XIII's Apostolic Letter Praeclara,
June 20, 1894, and Encyclical Graves de
Communi, Jan. 18, 1901; Pius X's Motu
Proprio De Actione Populari Christiana,
Dec. 8, 1903; Benedict XV's Encyclical Ad
Beatissimi, Nov. 1, 1914; Pius IX's
Encyclical Ubi Arcano, Dec. 23, 1922,
and Encyclical Rite Expiatis, Apr.
30, 1926.
17. Cf. La
Hierarchie catholique et le probleme social
depuis l'Encyclique "Rerum Novarum,"
1891-1931, pp. XVI-335; ed. "Union
internationale d'Etudes sociales fondee a
Malines, en 1920, sous la presidence du
Card. Mercier." Paris, Editions "Spes,"
1931.
18. Isa.
11:12.
19.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
48.
20.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
54.
21.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
68.
22.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
77.
23.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
78.
24. Pius X,
Encyclical, Singulari Ouadam, Sept.
24, 1912.
25. Cf. the
Letter of the Sacred Congregation of the
Council to the Bishop of Lille, June 5,
1929.
26. Cf. Rom.
1:14.
27. Cf.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
24-25.
28. Pius XI,
Encyclical, Ubi Arcano, Dec. 23,
1922.
29.
Encyclical, Ubi Arcano, Dec. 23,
1922.
30.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
35.
31.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
36.
32.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
14.
33.
Allocation to the Convention of Italian
Catholic Action, May 16, 1926.
34.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
12.
35.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
20.
36.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
67.
37. Cf. St.
Thomas, Summa theologica, II-II, Q.
134.
38.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
51.
39.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
28.
40.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
14.
41. II Thess.
3:10.
42. Cf. II
Thess. 3:8-10.
43.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
66.
44.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
61.
45.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
31.
46. Cf.
Encyclical, Casti Connubii, Dec. 31,
1930.
47. Cf. St.
Thomas, De regimine principum I, 15;
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
49-51.
48. Cf.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
31. Art. 2.
49. St.
Thomas, Contra Gentiles, III, 71; cf.
Summa theologica,
50.
Encyclical, Immortale Dei, Nov. 1,
1885.
51. Cf
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
76.
52. Eph.
4:16.
53.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
28
54. Cf. Rom.
13:1.
55. Cf.
Encyclical, Diuturnum illud, June 29,
1881.
56.
Encyclical, Divini illius Magistri
Dec 31 1929
57. Cf. Jas.
2.
58. II Cor.
8:9.
59. Matt.
11:28.
60. Cf. Luke
12:48.
61. Matt.
16:27.
62. Cf. Matt.
7:24ff.
63.
Encyclical, On the Condition of Workers,
41.
64. Cf. Matt.
16:26.
65. Cf. Judg.
2:17.
66. Cf. Matt.
7:13.
67. Cf. John
6:69.
68. Cf. Matt.
24:35.
69. Cf. Matt.
6:33.
70. Col.
3:14.
71. Rom.
12:5.
72. I Cor.
12:26.
73.
Encyclical, Ubi Arcano, Dec. 23,
1922.
74. Cf. Act.
20:28.
75. Cf. Deut.
31:7.
76. Cf. II
Tim. 2:3.
77. I Tim.
2:4.
78.
Encyclical, Mens Nostra, Dec. 20,
1929.
79. Cf. Matt.
16:18.
80. Cf. Luke
16:8.
81. Cf. Phil.
2:21.
82. Apoc.
5:13.
© Copyright - Libreria Editrice Vaticana
|